I'm a little late to the party, but I just read this and Cedar's page.
What I find amazing in this whole thing is that Cedar's whole blog article was a RED HERRING -- !!!
the REAL ISSUE was
*** COPYRIGHT ***
about the book he was distributing as a prize (CoC) and Mike and Kim called him out on it because it had been printed by a friend of his.
Rather than deal with the issue raised in the first place (which he only did by accusing them of the same, by their linking to a site which took you to a pdf download of the book), he then went on a whole SPREE regarding non-relevant types of activism and belief -- NONE of which addressed the orginal issue or topic in the first place -- the accusation of copyright violation!!!
He made a brief, "yeah I did it, oops, but so do other people" sort of defence, but the whole article went on forever and was full of rants and Rutherford-like accusations of evil opposers to his glorious, righteous self).
This is what boggled my mind when I read his blog and all the replies, where people accepted the red herring and didn't even wonder about his very WT-like bait-and-switch "defence".
What about THAT?? The damn copyright violation thing, which was supposed to be the crux of this very weird showdown?
And one cannot reply on his page if it is at all negative or even questioning of him. There is a lot of the WT programming in him, calibrating his brain....
It seems that when there is even a question put to him, he regards it as an attack.
The whole article was out of control.